Project 2000 Training Versus My 1970s Training
It was in this role that I became acquainted with the nurses who were to become known as the Project 2000 nurses.
The Project 2000 courses commenced slowly from September 1989.
A Royal College of Nursing Commission on Nursing Education in 1985 stated that it was now to be considered necessary for the nursing course to be based in higher education establishments and to be of diploma and degree level.
However, Macleod Clark et al (1996) suggested that the curriculum prioritised the theory to the detriment of practical skills; with the underpinning nature and aims of nurse education being one of health promotion rather than disease management.
Ironically, it was chronic disease management that I aimed to deliver in the 1990s and where I welcomed some of the first third year student nurses.
I was working in partnership with my patients to develop holistic tailor-made interventions and supported self-management plans to control their disease and enhance their well-being.
The student nurses from Project 2000 who attended my clinics were attentive and enthusiastic.
I noticed something interesting about these students.
I had gained years of extra training and knowledge over many years since my own registration - it’s what enabled me to run these clinics.
These student nurses, only in their third of training were already well acquainted with much of the theory.
However, in my experience, they, through no fault of their own, these Project 2000 student nurses lacked in their holistic approach and their interpersonal skills at that time.
My training in the 1970s gave us permission to spend time and talk to our patients, we weren’t made to feel guilty for getting to know them as individuals and did not have the constraints that today’s nurses may feel.
I had been doing these clinics for many years and I was so aware of the significance of developing an affinity with my patients.
For me, that achieved the best outcome for patients. It could be argued, of course, that my relationship with my patients was achieved as a result of my years of experience and not my training, and that these student nurses would also eventually achieve this level of awareness, care and compassion as their careers emerge.
Equally, it could be because my training ingrained this in me by allowing us the time to talk and get to know patients.
Comparing Nurse Training Over The Years
I am of the belief that the foundation and values that were instilled in me during my SRN training allowed me to fulfill this role.
The Royal College of Nursing (2003), stated that “Delivering professional nursing requires not just caring hands or a kind heart but also a sharp inquisitive mind; one that enables the practitioner to utilise clinical judgement and provision of care”.
I agree wholeheartedly with this statement but this is not a new phenomenon. It has applied to myself and my colleagues and I am sure to many generations of nurses that came before us and since.
In the 1990s the disquiet expressed was that during the degree and diploma courses nurses would be learning too much theory at the expense of practical skills.However, higher education for nurses in fact, was certainly not a new concept and what is little known about Florence Nightingale was that she is now considered to be an early forerunner of research nursing: “In a book which contains many of Florence Nightingale’s records from the Crimean war, it can be seen how she relentlessly pursued knowledge and used evidence -based frameworks to try and influence change” (McDonald, 2010).
The dying breed of the Matrons in the early 1970s were against every reform in nurse education.
They felt they were unnecessary changes for the worse which would also impact upon their manpower resource.
The graduate nurses were considered to be “too posh to wash” or “too clever to care”. I’m not sure about that. But I’m equally unsure that the first cohort of student nurses who came out of St Bartholomew’s in 1977 with a BSc in Nursing had received better training than me.
Furthermore, I’m unsure that all their extra theoretical nursing knowledge equipped them better for the baptism of fire that is being a Newly Qualified Nurse.
Caring Hands & Kind Hearts Versus Clinical Practitioners?
It has been suggested by nurse academics, that nurses like myself and my colleagues had been poorly trained and what we were trained for was very narrow and limited compared to the training of nurses today.
As if the caring hands and kind heart of the 1970s nurse did not allow her to be an effective clinical practitioner in her own right, as if each attribute was at the expense of the other and as if they are unable to coexist.
It could be argued that the clinical and often theoretical skills we achieved back then were obtained despite the lack of technology, as we had to rely on our observational skills to a much larger extent.
I don’t agree that what we were trained for was very narrow and limited compared to nursing degree courses and training today because I really don’t think they should be compared at all and certainly not negatively.
They should be considered as being of their time and era, not judged unfairly but being a stepping stone to the nurse we see today.
After all, without the training and practice of nurses of my generation, progress or changes for the better could not be achieved.
Our training equipped us to have inquiring minds and to learn something about the patients in our care even during the execution of the most menial tasks.
It was not about just undertaking a routine task it was about being open to how and why we were carrying it out too!
We were trained to believe that every moment we spent with our patients was an opportunity to extend our knowledge of the particular individual, be it their general condition or their emotional well-being.
It was truly an holistic approach and the permission we were given to talk to our patients allowed us to hone our observational skills to a greater degree. We were hands on but with our eyes and heads on too and learned that no encounter with our patients was time wasted.
It’s Not Which Nurse Training Method Is Best But Lifting The Best Aspects Of All Of Them
My own senior tutor during my nurse training later continued his career at Swansea University when they discontinued the schools of nursing.
In 1976 we were his first ever group of student nurses and to say that was a privilege, would be an understatement.
He headed a group of clinical nurse tutors and together we all began our journey. I thought this teaching team were inspirational from the very first day.
Above all, they taught me that care is not something that should be done or delivered under the pressure of an audit culture.
That route can result in nursing being measured against the wrong values.
The compassionate nurses of today understand the right values.
And they ought to feel free to consider close patient contact as a learning opportunity just as we did in the 1970s.
In terms of comparing the 1970s nurse with today’s nurse, it is not about evaluating which is better, but recognising the attributes of both and the virtues of both types of training.
Conclusion - Nursing Is Still A Vocation And Not Just A Job
In the late 1960s The General Nursing Council criticised the Platt Report for what it did for nurse training - moving the focus to more academically minded students.
It felt it marked a deviation from nursing as a vocation by focussing more on academic qualifications, leadership and career progression.
I would argue that nursing was still very much a vocation when I started in 1976.
And I would also say that nursing is still vocational today as I reflect over the last year on all the nurses who have put their patients before their own health and safety.
That can’t be taught.
I believe it is vital that in this busy world we ensure that our patients know we are interested in them as people and not just their condition.
That they know that we care about them, and that our tact and sensitivity to them is given priority so that they can become partners in their own care.
Nursing is still a vocation and not just a job.
About this contributor
Registered Nurse & Midwife (retired)
I’m a 63 year old wife, mother and grandmother and live in Swansea. I worked for the NHS as a Registered Nurse and Midwife for over 41 years and retired 3 years ago. I have since completed a MSc in autism and related conditions and now provide therapy to young adults on the autistic spectrum and train other therapists.
More by this contributorWant to get involved in the discussion?
Log In Subscribe to commentChristopher Gibbon
Christopher Gibbon
one year agoLoved reading your post, my mother enrolled as a nurse in Neath hospital in 1935 , I still have all ... read more
Loved reading your post, my mother enrolled as a nurse in Neath hospital in 1935 , I still have all her books and a poem written about her by a Welsh Bard !
read less
Thank you so much Christopher for taking the time to comment on my post. So pleased you enjoyed reading it. Such great memories of your mum too working at Neath pre war.
Tim Styche
Tim Styche
2 years agoI'd be fascinated to read your thoughts about the Nurse Associate role; the 2-year foundation degree programme that aims to ... read more
I'd be fascinated to read your thoughts about the Nurse Associate role; the 2-year foundation degree programme that aims to 'bridge the gap' between HCAs and RNs whilst also having NMC Registration. It also has the opportunity to complete a shorter course to uplift to full RN.
read less
Hi Tim Good to hear from you and thank you for asking my thoughts on the Nurse Associate role. I may not be correct in this assumption bit it appears that the Nurse Associate will have a very similar ... read more
Hi Tim Good to hear from you and thank you for asking my thoughts on the Nurse Associate role. I may not be correct in this assumption bit it appears that the Nurse Associate will have a very similar role to that of the old State Enrolled Nurse SEN. I mentioned them a few times in my blog and I cannot emphasise enough the positive impact they had on myself as a student nurse. They had all the hands on experience of a qualified nurse, without having the restrictions of carrying out a management role. Their contribution to nursing was immense for both patients and staff and if this could be repeated with the nursing associate, the future of nursing will be brighter. Lynn Coleman
read less
Julia Orege
Julia Orege
3 years agoExcellent article about the rolling changes in nursing over the years. Very enlightening to those trained in more recent years,where ... read more
Excellent article about the rolling changes in nursing over the years. Very enlightening to those trained in more recent years,where often required paperwork has replaced time talking with/observing patients. I qualified in 1985 so can closely identify with alot of the author's sentiments.
read less
Hi Julia Thank you for your lovely comments. I am glad you found my article enlightening and enjoyed reading it. Lynn Coleman
Elizabeth Hudson
Elizabeth Hudson
3 years agoHi, I too trained as an SRN in the 1970's. Kindness and compassion with a heartfelt desire to care can ... read more
Hi, I too trained as an SRN in the 1970's. Kindness and compassion with a heartfelt desire to care can never be taught either in what were, the old schools of nursing or any present day University. Yes, theory and practical skills can be taught and these are absolute necessity, but nursing needs to be so much more than that. Sadly, it is that extra something that seems to be missing in so many nurses presently. The ability to see, interpret and respond to another's needs, cannot only be attached to a degree. I guess we all thnk what we had or did was the best time, but in nursing, how it was in the 70's and 80's was, overall, a caring profession where people trained to be nurses rather than,l as so often seems the case presently, where people are taking a less challenging route than going through a medical degree, with the intention of being "mini doctors". I do wonder in years to come, when many of us oldies are retired, wo will care about patients and I mean really care?
read less
Hi Elizabeth, thank you for taking the time to reply to my article. I enjoyed reading your comments and wholeheartedly agree with you when you state that kindness and compassion cannot be taught in wh... read more
Hi Elizabeth, thank you for taking the time to reply to my article. I enjoyed reading your comments and wholeheartedly agree with you when you state that kindness and compassion cannot be taught in whatever mode of training or establishment. Also that some nurses today perhaps do not feel that they are doing a worthwile job unless they are undertaking procedures which used to be exclusively the sphere of Doctors. Many though want to be the compassionate nurse but feel the restraints of an audit culture whereby care is not valued as it should be. Thank you Lynn
read less