How Much Does Losing Staff Cost The NHS?
Putting an exact figure on the cost of staff turnover is difficult.
We know the numbers. The Guardian put the number of people leaving the NHS at 400 per week. The NHS SBS put the turnover rate of Nurses at a typical Trust at 12%. The NMC's figures for May 2022 showed a 13% increase in the number of Nurses leaving the register in the last year over the previous year (25,219).
(And the numbers can't be put down to the pandemic. A Nuffield Trust report explained its figures were roughly the same as pre-pandemic levels, and that Covid only accounts for 14% of the Nurses who left the profession.)
So, the evidence is clear: the number of NHS staff leaving (including Nurses) is high.
But, what is the cost?
Estimating the total financial cost is very challenging. That’s primarily because an employee’s value is complex – as is the cost of replacing them.
Then there’s the well-publicised cost of interim bank or agency staff to cover for the loss.
From 2015, following some eye-watering headlines about the revenues of agencies supplying Nurses to the NHS, action was taken (leading in no small part to the creation of The NHS People Plan).
Reports in The Telegraph at that time estimated billions in revenue each year were paid to nursing agencies to supply NHS-trained staff back to itself.
The following is a quote from the BBC at the time:
The latest figures show NHS trusts in England spent £1.9bn on locum staff in just three months this summer.
The financial figures were shocking and measures were immediately introduced by the Government to curb the spend.
By 2018 the NHS had managed to cut spend on agencies by £1.2bn.
But beyond that, there are what could be termed secondary costs. These could include an initial deficit in terms of productivity while a new person gets accustomed to a new role, or increased absence of colleagues who become overstretched and overworked.
We can consider all of these factors – all of which deserve attention.
But in terms of a broad, overall cost, a report by the Modern Society Initiative and the Healthcare Workers’ Foundation (MSI / HWF) has attempted to find one.
The report suggests that NHS staff retention rates are dropping, and that the cost of not addressing this issue will be £21.7 billion.
This calculation is approximate of course, based on training costs and likely recruitment challenges in the coming years.
But it’s a useful indicator of just how enormous this issue is.
How Much Does It Cost To Train And Recruit NHS Nurses?
To break this issue down, it’s useful to analyse some of the specific costs related to the retention challenge.
A report published in NHS SBS puts the cost of replacing a fully-trained nurse at £12,000. And, as it points out, with nursing turnover of up to 12%, the costs soon rack up:
A large acute NHS trust with over 3,000 nurses, for example, will typically have a turnover rate of between 10-12%. This means needing to recruit more than 300 new nurses on an annual basis. With the total financial impact of replacing a fully-trained nurse estimated to be anything up to £12k, this equates to a minimum spend of £3.6m every year.
That doesn’t include the initial recruitment costs – the price of actually finding and attracting prospective nursing staff to train in the first place.
A case study for Hillingdon Hospitals’ NHS Foundation Trust found that it cost £8,477.80 to recruit 21 UK Nurses, and £6,371.41 to hire 1 Nurse from overseas.
Again, multiply this figure by thousands, and you get a realistic sense of the scale of the cost of recruiting to replace leavers. Especially when you consider that almost half of the new Nurses on the NMC register have joined from overseas (in the report above, the cost can exceed 10 times that of recruiting a UK Nurse).
How Much Does An Agency Nurse Cost?
Agency spending has been improved over recent years by the agency cap. However, the dependence on interim staff hasn’t gone away.
A BBC study in 2017 found that the cost of an agency Nurse to an NHS trust could easily reach £100,000 a year.
In 2018, the BBC also reported that Northern Ireland's five Trusts spent £12m with just one agency hiring staff.
And the most recent comprehensive summary of agency and bank spending across the NHS found that the cost for all staff reached £6.2 billion for 2019-20.
How Much Does Absence Cost The NHS?
The link between staff retention and staff absence has been made very clear in recent years within the NHS.
Staff absence is often a very clear indicator of someone who may leave their role (increased risk of leaving the NHS). And especially during the pandemic, the impact of under-staffing on absence has been undeniable.
But even prior to Covid 19, staff absence in the NHS was high: "Sickness absence rates in the NHS are higher than in the rest of the economy. NHS staff sickness rates rose from 3.8 per cent in April 2018 to 4.1 per cent in April 2019. This is the highest level at that time of year in more than a decade, and represents more than 1.4 million full-time equivalent (FTE) days lost in that month alone." (Kingsfund.org, 2019)
The NHS lost more than 1.4 million full-time equivalent (FTE) days in April 2019 due to sickness absence
And in August 2021, Nursing Times discovered that there had been a 37% increase in mental health related absences.
And the Government is taking the issue so seriously that the House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee has held reviews into the impact of burnout and resilience in the NHS.
But what does the absence of an NHS worker actually cost the NHS?
Well, we can refer to the interim costs mentioned above.
Needless to say, an interim worker costs far more than a full-time employee across an entire year.
But more broadly, the NHS itself has released data that suggests the cost of staff absence to the NHS is around £2.4 billion a year, with a cost of £1.7m due to sickness absence for an average Trust.
Once more, this aspect of the retention challenge represents a significant cost to the NHS.
About this contributor
Nurses.co.uk Founder
I launched Nurses.co.uk (and subsequently Socialcare.co.uk, Healthjobs.co.uk and Healthcarejobs.ie) in 2008. 600 applications are made every day via our jobs boards, helping to connect hiring organisations recruiting for clinical, medical, care and support roles with specialist job seekers. Our articles, often created by our own audience, shine a light on the career pathways in healthcare, and give a platform to ideas and opinions around their work and jobs.
More by this contributorWant to get involved in the discussion?
Log In Subscribe to commentJane Bullard
Jane Bullard
2 years agoInteresting article and well written! We need to understand what our workforce of the future are looking for - if ... read more
Interesting article and well written! We need to understand what our workforce of the future are looking for - if we keep offering the same we will carry on getting the same results!
read less
Thanks! I agree. It's nuanced and complicated. So guesswork or just pinning the blame on pay won't work.
Marinica Mihaela Froicu
Marinica Mihaela Froicu
2 years agoThank you Matt , I don't think hiring abroad is an impediment! We are all free to choose where we practice ... read more
Thank you Matt , I don't think hiring abroad is an impediment! We are all free to choose where we practice our profession, the important thing is to practice it professionally, to respect and be respected for what we do! There is no employee and no employer! There is only collaboration! Someone needs your services for which you have qualified and make them available for a fee because the life is expensive! If the NHS needs qualified doctors and nurses, then recognize them, respect their work by paying reasonable salaries for their responsibility! NHS needs professionalism! He wouldn't have that if he didn't pay you enough for it! Medical professionalism does not come from a certain country, it comes from each of us who treat with respect the work for which we dedicate ourselves! The NHS should recognize this every time it recruits people for healthcare!
read less
I agree, it's not an impediment to good healthcare outcomes or patient care. I'm not talking about the quality of skills or care. I'm talking about migration of skills over investing in the workforce ... read more
I agree, it's not an impediment to good healthcare outcomes or patient care. I'm not talking about the quality of skills or care. I'm talking about migration of skills over investing in the workforce from the ground up. I personally don't feel plugging the gap in the workforce by importing skills is a long-term solution. A long-term solution is investing in developing skills and talent within the UK(supporting training of Nurses through bursaries etc)and also in spending to retain the existing nursing workforce. There is an argument to say that hiring the best talent from developing nations is not sustainable(perhaps even ethical)for those nations.
read less
Marinica Mihaela Froicu
Marinica Mihaela Froicu
2 years agoVery simple: very big responsibilities, many rules, procedures and policies and not everyone can do and not everyone wants to ... read more
Very simple: very big responsibilities, many rules, procedures and policies and not everyone can do and not everyone wants to take on these responsibilities for low wages, unmotivated professionally, too much stress and working under pressure for little money and low wages! Because of this, the NHS is always short of staff, because it is sick and less money. If you are lucky enough to be qualified staff or nurse, most of the time in another country from Europe ,it is very good for them, not for you because you have no chance to progress in your career, they never have time to give you complete training and to have the good luck to practice more! Again because it’s always short of staff and everybody it is in rush! Too many patients overbooked according to the number of staff. This means poor professional care and poor medical quality. Patients are treated as numbers. The NHS should further stimulate the staff with intrinsic and extrinsic rewards to avoid collapse NHS and recruit more staff as well! Staff nurse, Mihaela
read less
Carl Young
Carl Young
2 years agoA well written and thought provoking article. For me, retention starts at recruitment. When staff are over promised and underdelivered. The ... read more
A well written and thought provoking article. For me, retention starts at recruitment. When staff are over promised and underdelivered. The enthusiasm for the Trust, Role or department is already dented. Add to this the high level of demand (physical and mental) of being a carer and life saver 12 hours a shift, often with minimal breaks, if any, then the slide into disappointment with the role commences. Working nurses too hard for too long equates to undervaluing them. When we feel undervalued we tend to examine why we are doing what we are doing and weigh up the balance of pro’s and con’s. If that balance includes long hours, poor support (numbers, seniority, resources,etc), poor renumeration, poor job prospects - we ask ourselves why we are doing something. If there is less in the positive pile than the negative, we start to look at what alternatives there are. The childhood dream of being a nurse can not be sustained on good will and a feeling of satisfaction alone - being able to self actualise your needs with the ability to secure your own home, support your, and your families needs, and provide the things that are expected in modern life then become the motivators to move on to a job that provides a better income. This piece shows the lack of forward planning and strategy to sustain the workforce of the NHS. The solution provided appears to be throw some money at it now and hopefully the problem will go away or something else will interest the public instead. We need a planned and delivered strategy that is not based on a university commercial model to get new recruits into nursing. We need more appropriate pay for experienced and dedicated staff to help retain, and we need increased numbers of staff to deliver staff patient ratios that do not compromise care or run the current staff into the ground so they leave. Don’t say we can’t afford it - the money is spent already supporting the system that has been created when using agency staff - re-allocation of funds to enhance pay and resources is the key.
read less
Thanks Carl. Yes, I agree with all of that. I also don't think that hiring from overseas is a long-term solution. It is also not sustainable(for the country whose skills we are depleting). As you migh... read more
Thanks Carl. Yes, I agree with all of that. I also don't think that hiring from overseas is a long-term solution. It is also not sustainable(for the country whose skills we are depleting). As you might see, I do personally believe in the principle of the People Plan, and the People Promise. If rhetoric can be actioned. There is much work to be done. Recruitment is comparatively easy. But it's a costly sticking plaster and it is not funding a solution. Retention takes investment, planning and a long-term commitment. It also requires money. Proper money. But if the cost of not investing in it can be quantified, then it begins to make financial sense, as well as ethical sense. We have spoken to many broken nurses over the years. They want to give and care but they are often not shown the support they need. And I don't believe it's all about pay either. Retention is complicated. That's the fact of the matter. But it's not an insurmountable problem if the vision and commitment and budgets are there.
read less
John Gregan
John Gregan
3 years agoHello Nikki, I am a retired GP and have witnessed untold damage in the NHS from staff absences , and I ... read more
Hello Nikki, I am a retired GP and have witnessed untold damage in the NHS from staff absences , and I am keen to try and improve things for those in post, and for me who is encountering difficulties in trying to return. I would be grateful if you would contact me , if that sits well with you?
read less
Hello John. Please could I ask you to contactme in the first instance, on Thank you.
Thamsanqa Sibanda
Thamsanqa Sibanda
3 years agoWell-written and insightful piece. I still can’t comprehend why employers are so determined to spend more on agency than in ... read more
Well-written and insightful piece. I still can’t comprehend why employers are so determined to spend more on agency than in their own regular staff who, as mentioned, “know the idiosyncrasies of [the] place of work inside out.” The amount of effort put into recruitment should also be the applied to retention.
read less
Hello, thank you for your kind response. We believe that Retention starts the moment a new Recruit begins and we feel passionately that we can lead others to believe this to.