- 30 August 2019
- 2 min read
New survey reveals ‘dangerous’ misunderstanding about cervical cancer
SubscribeEven those in monogamous relationships are at risk of contracting human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes most cases of cervical cancer.

Survey reveals misunderstanding about cervical cancer
Nearly half of women wrongly believe they are not at risk from the leading cause of cervical cancer if they are in a long-term relationship, a new survey suggests.
The YouGov poll found that whilst almost all cases of cervical cancer are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), 48% think they are not at risk if they have been in a monogamous relationship for some time.
However, as the symptoms can remain dormant for many years and both men and women can get reinfected several times during their life, being in a long-term relationship does not remove the risk.

The survey also found that 17% of people – and more than a quarter of over-55s – believe sexual promiscuity is the main risk factor for cervical cancer, while around 7% think that if their partner receives an HPV diagnosis they have been unfaithful.
HPV stigma needs to be tackled
Vicki Bokor Ingram, cervical cancer lead at Roche Diagnostics UK & Ireland, a pharmaceutical company which commissioned the survey, described the misunderstandings highlighted by the research as “dangerous”, adding that the “stigma” around HPV needs to be tackled.
Another misunderstanding about cervical cancer highlighted by the survey is that a large proportion (42%) of women believe they do not need to be screened for cervical cancer if they have already been vaccinated.
While the NHS says that the vaccine protects against around 70% of cervical cancers, the risk has not been eradicated.
Just over a fifth (21%) of survey respondents said they have no idea how HPV, which is passed on through sexual contact, is transmitted and 52% said they did not know that both men and women can be infected.
About this contributor
Nurses.co.uk editorial team
Bringing you a daily update of nursing, NHS, health and social care news from around the UK.
More by this contributorWant to get involved in the discussion?
Log In Subscribe to comment